🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have scraped a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them online.

Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers noted the seeming data breach could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for material to develop their models.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and album names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, stated that the breach did not constitute its entire catalog.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorised access found a third party collected public metadata and used illicit tactics to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Stated Goal and Worries

Spotify does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group asserted the music files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

AI Training and Copyright Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, said the breached music would likely be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a huge online repository of pirated books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its systems.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “create their own private free version of the service”. He said it could also enable technology firms to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a battleground between artists, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Responses

In the UK, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to let AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every participant to a government consultation on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for science, research and technology informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.