🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the tension triggered by the presentation of a new 28-point plan for resolving the conflict appeared – momentarily – to have been stabilised. A Washington representative spoke of "significant advancement" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its response: a renewed assault of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Peace Talks and Military Action

The sequence of conflicting incidents captured the grim essence of the recent timeframe. By day, diplomatic battles are waged: hopeful statements are issued from various governments. Significant resources is devoted on restraining specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin brutally reminds the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the main instrument for achieving "settlement".

Nocturnal Warfare

As military strikes progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the immediate reality of Ukraine's defenselessness was revealed. Ukraine is equipped to monitor missile launches from enemy soil, a capability provided through current data. From vantage locations, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been deployed to engage hostile aerial threats flew past – advanced fighter aircraft delivered to Ukraine by Western partners.

Shortly after, Kyiv's air-defence systems engaged: defensive missiles fired to intercept a incoming threat. This was a modern interception technology at work, probably delivered by partner states. Every deployment jolts you unexpectedly, rattling buildings. The instant of fear quickly becomes grim resignation: perhaps the approaching threat won't cause damage this time, protecting urban areas from catastrophe and further power outages.

Persistent Threats

Soon after, a heavy machine gun engaged a drone close by, part of a mobile-fire group – almost certainly imported technology. Regrettably, the shots failed to hit the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its objective.

Intermittently, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv faced the morning news: several casualties, damage and heating outages in multiple buildings as a result of the night's assault. As customarily, everyone still continued their routines – experiencing conflict. But those entire period illustrated Ukraine's essential dependence on external assistance – a reliance that regional partners are evidently unprepared to substitute in the near term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The comprehensive proposal from US administration generated strong feelings, debate and serious worry – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after prior negotiation attempts and multilateral gatherings.

Every new initiative from US leadership unfolds according to the consistent cycle: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, effectively counters. They stabilise the situation but never actually win the battle. This cycle will, undoubtedly, endure.

Political Considerations

It is convenient to criticize certain parties of persistently promoting Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the whole story. Washington functions according to a assumption familiar among international relations experts: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have lost on the battlefield. The American government assumes that it is impossible to force Russia to abandon the territory that it presently holds in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The issue is that while acknowledging this situation, American administration does minimal to prevent Kremlin actions, through words or deeds, from believing that the current condition will not evolve additionally in its benefit in the near future.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, Russian leadership is certain that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its supporters are coming close to fatigue. Their reason to agree to terms that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is close to zero. There may be many attempts to end hostilities, but they will persist as long as Russia's leader remains completely certain in the outcome.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still hold out, slowly losing people and territory but averting a entire defensive failure until situations evolve in its advantage.

Current Realities

Realistically, there are no real preconditions for a truce. Now, personal considerations are becoming relevant: political desires to broker a ceasefire and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Ukrainian leadership's double obstacles – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the national cause against any initiative Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their priority does not move to domestic problems. And although their task will now be significantly challenging after latest incidents, it remains quite doubtful that this will alter their fundamental strategy.

These two forces are driving the talks.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a just a single week to kill the suggested clauses of the latest plan. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by American leadership, opposition by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with pacifying measures of negotiators, and finally, recent disclosures, all did their job.

While new proposals based on established approaches are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist diplomatic offensives from Washington that are rooted in Kremlin requirements and show certain reluctance to alter the situation, if they remain united and improve their protective measures at a much faster pace. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to repel nightly air assaults will, for the coming months, largely rely on continued Western support.